{"id":16949,"date":"2025-05-12T16:08:06","date_gmt":"2025-05-12T16:08:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.leavittbrothers.com\/?p=16949"},"modified":"2025-05-13T18:37:01","modified_gmt":"2025-05-13T18:37:01","slug":"how-warren-buffett-made-his-money","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.leavittbrothers.com\/?p=16949","title":{"rendered":"How Warren Buffett Made His Money"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>At the recent Berkshire investor meeting in Omaha, Warren Buffett said he will be stepping down from his CEO duties at the end of the year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If Buffett isn&#8217;t the greatest investor in history, he&#8217;s certainly in the top handful, and at that point, it really doesn&#8217;t matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I want to talk through his bottom line accomplishment and then bring it back to how he made his money.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Kobeissi Letter posted the following on Twitter\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Since 1964, Berkshire Hathaway has returned over 5,500,000%.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That&#8217;s 5.5 MILLION percent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A $10,000 investment in 1964 would be worth $550 million today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This compares to a ~39,000% return in the S&amp;P 500.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Buffett has outperformed the S&amp;P 500 by over 140 TIMES.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While this is likely technically true, Berkshire had the advantage of being a teeny tiny company at the beginning. And it was only this very low starting point that paved the way for the extreme outperformance. It&#8217;s true Berkshire has done better than the S&amp;P, but if you start counting at a date after 1964, the outperformance is impressive but not other worldly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It&#8217;s legit to ask how Berkshire outperformed by such a wide margin. After all, they own GEICO. Are we to believe it&#8217;s significantly better than the other top insurance companies? They also own Coke and Pepsi and many other household names. But the S&amp;P owns those too. How do you outperform the index when the index owns the same stocks? I&#8217;m pretty sure wholly owned businesses such as See&#8217;s Candies aren&#8217;t going to make up the difference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It comes down to position sizing. For example, AAPL is 6.7% of the S&amp;P 500, but it&#8217;s 28.1% of Berkshire\u2019s stock holdings. That&#8217;s how you get outperformance &#8211; by being overweight in the best stocks. Here are some numbers posted by MarketSentiment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img src=\"http:\/\/leavittbrothers.com\/pm5\/aaplspx050525.jpg\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The first calculation suggests Berkshire did much better with AAPL than if it had never bought it. That one stock was the difference between a 174% gain and a 142% gain over the time period. That&#8217;s not insignificant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The second calculation is suspect because they took AAPL out of Berkshire, but they didn&#8217;t take AAPL out of the S&amp;P.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But the point remains. One stock made a big difference in Berkshire&#8217;s performance. In fact, many have made the case Buffett is good but not necessarily amazing because such a big percentage of his gains have come from a small number of investments. And if you took away several of those, his performance would not be noteworthy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But this is by design. It&#8217;s not an accident. Charlie Munger himself admitted &#8220;if you took away our best 10 investments, our performance would be average.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Buffett didn&#8217;t accidentally get lucky and invest in 10 outsized winners. That&#8217;s what he set out to do. He has said &#8220;concentration builds wealth; diversification preserves wealth.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He placed concentrated bets on a small number of positions over the last 60 years, and the returns from those positions are the difference between matching the S&amp;P 500 and destroying the S&amp;P 500. It&#8217;s the difference between being average and possibly being the greatest ever.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ten investments. That&#8217;s it. Just 10.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It&#8217;s one of the reasons I say you only need one good one every once in a while.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At the recent Berkshire investor meeting in Omaha, Warren Buffett said he will be stepping down from his CEO duties at the end of the year. If Buffett isn&#8217;t the greatest investor in history, he&#8217;s certainly in the top handful, and at that point, it really doesn&#8217;t matter. I want to talk through his bottom [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.leavittbrothers.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16949"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.leavittbrothers.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.leavittbrothers.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.leavittbrothers.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.leavittbrothers.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16949"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.leavittbrothers.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16949\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16951,"href":"https:\/\/blog.leavittbrothers.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16949\/revisions\/16951"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.leavittbrothers.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16949"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.leavittbrothers.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16949"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.leavittbrothers.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16949"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}