The Swiss National Bank, which had previously worked tirelessly to suppress the value of its currency, the Swiss franc, decided to end the effort. The franc immediately soared 30% vs. the euro, and the Swiss stock market crashed 10%.
This has many ramifications – I’m sure I’ll miss several – so let’s go through them and what the domino effect could be. I will try to fit them in three different categories: 1) Stability perception by the world, 2) the cost of doing business and 3) possible domino effect.
Stability Perception by the World
Financially, Switzerland is considered very conservative and very safe. People and business all over Europe borrow Swiss francs because rates are low, and it’s considered a safe haven. In fact it’s reported by Bloomberg that 40% of mortgages in Poland are denominated in Swiss francs.
All this can be throw out the window. A very trusted and stable financial center is no longer stable and can no longer be trusted.
According to Yahoo Finance, Switzerland has less people than Virginia and a smaller economy than Turkey, so it’s not exactly a major financial player. Still, this event – albeit relatively minor – can be a tipping point? It could be the equivalent of Bear Sterns or Lehman going belly up. I’m not predicting this, but trust is important, and if an extremely trusted financial center can so easily renege on cited intentions, who can be trusted?
The Cost of Doing Business
The price of goods and doing business for those that deal in a currency other than francs will go up.
Yesterday I could go to Switzerland and for every dollar I gave them, they’d give me approximately 1.02 francs. Today that same dollar will only get me 0.88 francs. So assuming the price of good remains the same, prices just jumped for tourists – and for the sake of this write-up, let’s call all businesses tourists too because they arrive in the country with dollars or euros and have to convert.
The opposite is also true. Anyone who gets paid in francs but then has to convert to dollars will be happen to get more dollars, so this is a big boon for Switzerland locals.
I saw the opposite take place in Costa Rica. When I arrived, the conversion was 1 dollar = 500 colones. But about a year later, the conversion jumped to 1 dollar = 550 colones. For me, I was in heaven – well, if you could consider saving a little money to be heaven – because when I converted my dollars to the local currency, they gave me more. I was hedged. If the price of things went up 10%, it didn’t matter because I got 10% more money when I converted. The people who got screwed were locals who were paid in colones but then had to convert to dollars to pay rent or other things.
The opposite is happening in Switzerland. Those inside the country who get paid in francs benefit when they exchange to another currency, but those outside the country take a hit. This could certainly hit tourism in the near term and could discourage business from entering the country in the long term.
But tourism is minor compared to those who took out loans in francs.
Let’s take a Polish homeowner who borrowed francs to buy a house. He’s not screwed, but it’s going to be much harder to make the monthly payments. Instead of 1 Polish zloty converting to 0.28 francs, now it only converts to 0.23 francs. That homeowner is going to have to come up with a lot more money to make the payment. Yikes.
Possible Domino Effect
I don’t know how contained the Polish housing market, but spreading losses among millions of individual people is much more manageable than having big hedge funds and banks possibly throw into the mix.
If the Swiss government was going to limit the franc’s upside, that sounds like a good short.
Short the franc and take the money and play the game somewhere else. Sounds like a good trade to me. Heck the government invitations to do this were as strong as the Saudi Oil Minister repeatedly saying oil production would not be cut…and that he didn’t care if oil dropped to $20.
So what just happened to those who shorted the franc? They immediately have a huge loss.
And what if they did it with leverage? Even bigger loss.
And this comes in many forms. It’s not just those who shorted the franc. What about those who just borrowed in francs – because the currency was stable, boring and rates were very low – and now find themselves on the wrong side of a currency conversion. And what if they used leverage?
I don’t know how this will play out. No doubt some funds will go belly up if they were short the franc with leverage. But what if they have to liquidate holdings…which causes the market to drop…which triggers margin calls elsewhere and causes other funds to have to liquidate, etc, etc.
And it’s not just funds. What if big banks or entire countries sold francs, converted to another currency, and then did business elsewhere. It many be hard or impossible to service the loans.
It doesn’t take much to tip the market over, and considering the computers at work – if they sniff trouble, they will get very aggressive – I wonder if things could unravel like they did in 2007 and 2008. I’m not predicting it. I’m just throwing in out there.
The first step of an unraveling would be the drop in highly liquid assets (to cover losses elsewhere), but if the losses are too big, jump to counter party insurance risk and all that other stuff (and who knows what’s going on behind the scenes) (remember AIG imploding)…
Bear Sterns wasn’t a massive company, and the infested part of the company was very tiny – I think it was just two funds that were way over-leveraged. Yet it still was enough to get the ball rolling. I’m not predicting this, but this is the type of sudden and unexpected event that could begin the process of unraveling the world financial system.
0 thoughts on “Ramifications of the Swiss Franc Move”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Well written article Jason.Im glad to read more regarding the Swiss National Bank’s unexpected decision to uncap its peg versus the euro which has been maintained at 1.20 via printing francs to buy euros on a consistent basis. The threshold has been intact since the summer of 2011. Surely there will be many known and unknown repercussions. I don’t even know where to start but the VIX is already indicating a bad scenarrio. Do you think this will be a short term or a long term shock? One thing is for certain that when ever there are gigantic and out of the blue moves in any market is not good. It means many investors have lost a lot of money in a very short time.
Countries and banks have been buying gold for years knowing the currency collapse was forthcoming. Great opportunities in GLD and FAZ.
if the 1929 depression was driven by trade tarifs to help soverign exporters
then the world has been doing the same for the last 5 years by idiot central bankers and politicans trying to goose the currencies by QE to help its soverign banks and exporters
NOW THE PONSI MAY BE OVER
already large hedge funds and euro banks are in trouble inc german duetcher and this w/e many will be in talks about how to handle their margin calls
next week obarma speaks,dragi and imf and davos switzerland will be interesting and a lot more expensive
can dragi and the ecb save the day they would be stupid to try but who else can save europe banks
i worry about japan ,already bankrupt for many years and its insane large Q.E
those countries involve in qe [currency manipulation are going to get hit hard inc usa
china is the only one that i know off that has been stockpilling gold and buying australian /canadian mines etc so as it can take over the world with the chinesse yaun
AND ONCE USA LOOSES ITS RESERVE CURRENCY OF THE WORLD ITS BY BY USA
and if usa interest rates go up on next fed ,the 28th jan
sometimes u cant trust a central banker owned by goldmans and morgans
and what is the carry trade doing
Ah, the attraction of low interest rates to borrow money denominated in Y and invest on a leveraged basis in an asset that is denominated in x. Well, well, you pay a low interest rate on Y money because Y country manages its affairs better than x country. Poland is country x . Hungary is also country x. Y country is Switzerland. The Y money is lent by somebody. Who? Well, Well the answer does not blow in the wind!! The money is being lent by banks , and that money on their books is booked as an asset. Well the Polish and Hungarian borrowers of Y money cannot afford to pay the interest and capital repayment because the cost of paying x money has gone up to much so they want to default or start making noises about rapacious bankers because by engaging in currency risk fluctuations was to complicated for them to understand and the banks took advantage of the innocent virgins who claim to know nothing about foreign exchange risk. They run t the ir government and ask for help. So far it worked in Hungary and the Hungarian govt. made a law that froze the exchange rate between the forint and the Swiss franc at a much lower level favoring the borrower and disfavoring the lenders. Why, well there are many voters that engaged in this activity and only a very limited number of banks and they do not vote. Wait for Poland to do the same thing. Also expext the analyst to find out which banks are exposed to the risk of having lend the money in Swiss francs to people thatget paid in zlotys and forints.
Fred Simons